I agree. Not even a 360 view but it goes back to my same thing of people say things without the experience or understanding of something and speak with facts. And agai, it’s only 2 folks married. lol.
Pre nup convos offer a space to really see the impact of communication and trust but doing it from fear is not healthy and does not help anyone. Leading it as a way we are all making an informed decision is just another part of the process of marriage.
n be entagnled in their business debts or foreclosures or any other financial liability including restitution if incarceration happens. You can include how much or limts to debts you can take on, shares of items or assets, future assets etc. You can also revise them as a postnuptial agreement if anything changes.
So I may be a bit short in typing; I'm bout to go into a meet but:
A prenuptial agreement can be a sign of true love & protection. If I am the 'rich' partner, in the chance that something happens even on my behalf or not, I can guarantee a settlement or % to my partner. The agreement is not always about 100% me 0% them. It can be a way to also protect assets from alimony. They also protect you from the other person's debt in the marriage. If I marry a surgeon that makes 300k but has 450k in debt, that debt can be defautled to me and vice versa. You ca
Speaking of and on the pod use of it for this one, things like microcheating and infidelity are often used interchangeably. There are some things that are not infidelity because there’s no union or emotional agreement made. Most of the times they talk about getting into a relationship without being committed so it’s shaky to start. Or they’ll do the insinuating of cheating but fail to recognize omission in the same breath.
They use them wrong as hell on this podcast and in most public areas. People seldom ask for professional input but use them to sound like a professional. These are real things and throwing them around Willy nilly makes them more normalized of behavior and not abuse.